wcf - Missing something with Entity Framework for .NET 3.5? -

-

Is it not possible to create the necessary organizations when I have NK3 NSP3? I see the checkbox is disabled to support it, but it is available in Net 4.

I have got a DB in which there are only tables in relation to it. I need to create a Silverlight app (SL4) which allows the management of data within this app. I can not use .NET4 on the server ... only. NET3.5SP1 Therefore, in relation to EF, some relation in EF4 is not available to me. To get back to DB from the SL4 app, to avoid building the building as a lot of plumbing to search for.

Do you use Visual Studio 2010 and use the .NET Framework 3.5 in your project settings Are you

If so, then I think that with the "disabled checkbox" you mean that the foreign key column in the checkbox to create a unit model from the wizard (this checkbox is not present at all in VS2008 And when VS2010 targets .NET 4.0, it is not disabled. Therefore, my theory about .NET 3.5 with VS2010.)

Then, then it is relatively good news for you : This checkbox does not mean that No unit ties will be formed from tables connected to foreign key constraints. They can be built, even in unit framework 1 (.NET 3.5) You will not have only scaler unit properties that represent your foreign key column. (This checkbox is available only in .NET 4 - Checking, those properties will be included in the model.) Instead you will always have to deal with the objects referenced in their institutions (check if they are loaded, Manually load them or include them directly into questions, and so on).

Therefore, in the entity model in .NET 3.5 there is little scope for working with relationships, but foreign key constraints are still correctly represented and are automatically created and run wizards Enter and locate the generated unit model.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

windows - Heroku throws SQLITE3 Read only exception -

-
After I deploy the app to Heroku, I have to run migration scripts and get this error message ... ITES \ padrino \ prophetmargin & gt; Heroku Rack AR: Rack mutated! SQLite3 :: ReadOnlyException: only one try to write database to read: CREATE TABLE "schema_migrations" ( "version" varchar (255) NOT NULL) /disk1/home/slugs/215264_925fd2c_65a3/mnt/.bundle/gems/gems/ padrino-core- is 0.9.11 / lib / padrino-core / cli / rake.rb: 9: in `init ' how can this be? I also tried to run Heroku dbpush SQLite: //db/my-db.db and that did not work Horoku sqlite3 but using postgres does not do. I'm not sure why you are receiving this error, however, as I have used sqlite3 in development and when pushing it into its travel, they do some magic which migrates to postgrads. I'm absolutely sure how Heroku does 'backwash' this database but it seems that this is happening to you because it's the SQLite db file which is obviously due to Heroku's
Read more

lex - Building a lexical Analyzer in Java -

-
I am currently learning lexical analysis in compiler design. To know how a lexical analyzer actually works, I am trying to build myself. I am planning to make it in Java The input to the lexical analyzer is a .tex file that is of the following format. \ section {script} {intro} \ section {Scope} arbitrary text \ section {relevance} uncontrolled text \ subdivision (profit) arbitrary text \ subsubsection {in real life} \ subdivision {Ingredient} \ end {document} The output of the lecture may be a table of contents with a page number in another file. 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Scope 1 1.2 Relevance 2 1.2.1 Benefits 2 1.2.1.1 Real life 2 1.2.2 loss 3 I hope that This problem is within the scope of Language Analysis Read the .exe file and check '\' and continue to check whether it is actually on search In the sectioning command is set to indicate whether or not a flag variable is the type of sectioning. I hope the above approach will work for the construction of Lexa
Read more

python - rename keys in a dictionary -

-
I want to change the names of keys in a dictionary which are ints, and I need them so that the inputs with key zero They can sort correctly. For example, my keys are like this: '1', '101', '11' and I may need them: '001', '101', '011' What is doing, but I know that there is a better way tmpDict = {} in the ADC for the old: t MpDict ['% 04d'% int (olden)] = addict [oldkey] New controlled = tmpDict You are going wrong about this if you want to draw entries on a line in a specific way, then you have to sort on the extraction. for sorted (D, key = int): print '% s:% R'% (k, d [k]) < / Div>
Read more