policy - Help to argue why to develop software on a physical computer rather than via a remote desktop -

-

In my case we need to be physically present in the office during the development of the software.

I see that to help in the argument that software developers will have a dedicated physical software development computer, productive and cost effective, as a business case, we have argued that productivity is 25% It will be reduced, though it is my feeling that reality is probably close to 50%. This business case has not really been accepted and I find it very difficult to defend.

Background information: I work in a company that is not meant to develop core business software.

/ Stability is such a major priority, non-production systems / applications are deployed in a separate network.

  • The company has set up a standard policy to access the testing network, which will be accessed through the test network only through a remote desktop client, practically from a production computer Has to open a remote desktop client on a virtual computer located in a test network. On the remote computer's remote desktop, one will be able to access / run / install all development tools such as the Eclipse IDE.

  • There will be a dedicated physical computer for another solution, which is physically connected to the testing network only.

Both remote desktop and physical access solutions are available in the company.

There is nothing wrong with the technical remote system, not optimal and clearly anti-motivational. Remember that we are physically in the office, now with new policies, there are plans to remove physical computers connected to the test network.

We can see further that we are talking about almost. Out of 2000 employees, 50 computers, so the extra budget is relatively small. This cost is more about the policy.

Help is appreciated

I have a remote desktop connection Developed and it is possible, it can be very disappointing I will argue that due to employee morale and job satisfaction, developers should allow physical machines. If your happiness (and therefore productivity) is not a good enough cause for them, then you can fight with the losing fight.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

windows - Heroku throws SQLITE3 Read only exception -

-
After I deploy the app to Heroku, I have to run migration scripts and get this error message ... ITES \ padrino \ prophetmargin & gt; Heroku Rack AR: Rack mutated! SQLite3 :: ReadOnlyException: only one try to write database to read: CREATE TABLE "schema_migrations" ( "version" varchar (255) NOT NULL) /disk1/home/slugs/215264_925fd2c_65a3/mnt/.bundle/gems/gems/ padrino-core- is 0.9.11 / lib / padrino-core / cli / rake.rb: 9: in `init ' how can this be? I also tried to run Heroku dbpush SQLite: //db/my-db.db and that did not work Horoku sqlite3 but using postgres does not do. I'm not sure why you are receiving this error, however, as I have used sqlite3 in development and when pushing it into its travel, they do some magic which migrates to postgrads. I'm absolutely sure how Heroku does 'backwash' this database but it seems that this is happening to you because it's the SQLite db file which is obviously due to Heroku's
Read more

lex - Building a lexical Analyzer in Java -

-
I am currently learning lexical analysis in compiler design. To know how a lexical analyzer actually works, I am trying to build myself. I am planning to make it in Java The input to the lexical analyzer is a .tex file that is of the following format. \ section {script} {intro} \ section {Scope} arbitrary text \ section {relevance} uncontrolled text \ subdivision (profit) arbitrary text \ subsubsection {in real life} \ subdivision {Ingredient} \ end {document} The output of the lecture may be a table of contents with a page number in another file. 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Scope 1 1.2 Relevance 2 1.2.1 Benefits 2 1.2.1.1 Real life 2 1.2.2 loss 3 I hope that This problem is within the scope of Language Analysis Read the .exe file and check '\' and continue to check whether it is actually on search In the sectioning command is set to indicate whether or not a flag variable is the type of sectioning. I hope the above approach will work for the construction of Lexa
Read more

python - rename keys in a dictionary -

-
I want to change the names of keys in a dictionary which are ints, and I need them so that the inputs with key zero They can sort correctly. For example, my keys are like this: '1', '101', '11' and I may need them: '001', '101', '011' What is doing, but I know that there is a better way tmpDict = {} in the ADC for the old: t MpDict ['% 04d'% int (olden)] = addict [oldkey] New controlled = tmpDict You are going wrong about this if you want to draw entries on a line in a specific way, then you have to sort on the extraction. for sorted (D, key = int): print '% s:% R'% (k, d [k]) < / Div>
Read more