c# - !(ReferenceEquals()) vs != in Entity Framework 4 -


As long as no one overrides a particular behavior defined for the object, ... compare the references.

Sets in property, I have usually used patterns

  private MyType myProperty; Public MyType MyProperty {set {if (myProperty! = Value) {myProperty = value; // NotifyPropertyChanged}}}  

However, if the if statement is replaced in the code generated by the entity framework

  (reference references (myProperty, value))  

The use of referenceEquals is more clear (as I think all C # programmers do not know that == does the same thing Is not override if it is). / P>

Do I have to save between two different types? Are they probably accounting for the possibility that Poko designers have == ? Can override? In essence, if I have not overridden, then == contextExcus ()

instead! Cementix:

  • ReferenceEclocks () should be used if you think the objects are the same (check the identity).
  • Object. If you think the objects have the same value (parity check)
  • == () used only for the fixed type can go . Then use it for equality.

Of course the opposite counterparts are calculated accordingly.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

windows - Heroku throws SQLITE3 Read only exception -

lex - Building a lexical Analyzer in Java -

python - rename keys in a dictionary -